![]() ![]() Back then, it mentioned entry 42, or matters of “inter-State trade and commerce.” The Indian government had argued along similar lines during the parliamentary debates over its competence to regulate the sector as well. ![]() The government argued that it has constitutional powers to regulate online gaming, citing entry 31 of the Union List (which empowers it to regulate posts and telegraphs telephones, wireless, broadcasting and other like forms of communication), and Entry 97 (residual matters not mentioned in the state or concurrent lists). ![]() The Indian government asserted that it has the legislative competence to regulate online gaming in a challenge against rules it brought to regulate the sector filed at the Delhi High Court, CNBC-TV18 reported. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |